← Back to mind map

Knowledge branch 11 · Seminar 17

Manufacturer liability for safety defects

Manufacturer's Liability for Safety Defects

Core elements - ACL Part 3-5

基本构成 - ACL Part 3-5

01

ENGLISH

The claimant identifies a manufacturer, goods supplied in trade or commerce, a safety defect under s 9 and injury or recoverable damage caused by that defect. The regime is strict: proof of manufacturer negligence or a direct contract is unnecessary, but defect, causation and the statutory loss category must still be established.

中文解释

原告需识别manufacturer、trade or commerce中供应的goods、s 9下的safety defect以及由缺陷造成的可赔伤害或损失。该制度属于严格责任:无需证明manufacturer疏忽或存在直接合同,但仍须证明缺陷、因果关系及符合法定损失类别。

Manufacturer and safety defect

Manufacturer与safety defect

02

ENGLISH

Manufacturer is defined broadly to include the actual maker, grower, producer or assembler, a person holding itself out through branding, and some importers where an overseas maker lacks an Australian place of business. Goods have a safety defect when they are not as safe as persons generally are entitled to expect.

中文解释

Manufacturer定义广泛,包括实际制造者、种植者、生产者或组装者、通过品牌表明自己是制造者的人,以及在海外制造商没有澳洲营业地点时的部分进口商。商品未达到公众一般有权期待的安全程度时,即存在safety defect。

  • Consider marketing, packaging, instructions, warnings, reasonably expected use, time of supply, price and circumstances考虑营销、包装、说明、警告、合理预期用途、供应时间、价格及其他情况
  • A defect may lie in inadequate instructions or warnings, not only physical manufacture缺陷可存在于说明或警告不足,而不仅是实体制造问题

Recoverable loss - ss 138-141

可赔损失 - ss 138-141

03

ENGLISH

The regime covers personal injury to an individual, consequential loss suffered because another person was injured or died, damage to goods ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use while privately used, and damage to privately used land, buildings or fixtures. Business property losses often require another cause of action.

中文解释

制度覆盖个人身体伤害、因他人受伤或死亡产生的后续损失、私人使用时个人/家庭/家用类商品的损坏,以及私人使用土地、建筑物或固定物的损坏。商业财产损失通常需要依赖其他诉因。

Defences, limits and parallel claims

抗辩、限制与并行请求

04

ENGLISH

Section 142 provides defences where the defect did not exist at supply, arose from compliance with a mandatory standard, could not be discovered given scientific or technical knowledge, or was attributable to the design or instructions for a component. Claims face a three-year knowledge period and a ten-year long-stop under s 143, and liability cannot be excluded under s 150.

中文解释

s 142规定抗辩,包括供应时缺陷尚不存在、缺陷源于遵守强制标准、依当时科学技术知识无法发现,或零部件缺陷源于整体设计/指示。s 143通常规定三年知情期限及十年最长停止期限,且s 150禁止排除责任。

  • Claims may run alongside negligence, consumer guarantees, contract and misleading conduct请求可与negligence、consumer guarantees、contract及misleading conduct并行
  • Glendale, Skerbic and Ethicon illustrate defect, expectation and causationGlendale、Skerbic及Ethicon说明缺陷、公众期待与因果关系
  • Joint and several liability and contributory negligence may require separate analysis连带责任及共同过失需另行分析